Evo Forum

[FJF]

Originally Posted by superflyjmysnk

I changed my profile to update my current job at lockheed, not the job I had at sprint 2 years ago when I created my profile...

Given the shady stunts you've pulled throughout this thread, please forgive me for not relying on your word. That time had come and passed. There's no such thing as a coincidence, given the circumstances.

...as I figured your so intent on "winning" the argument you would most certainly check my profile for any edge.

1. There's no argument to (errr) win; you simply don't like my opinion. Too bad.

2. Please consider that you keep confronting me, not the other way around. That, alone, makes your comment totally disingenuous. Any other brilliant observations that are seemingly geared to save whatever is left of your ego?

3. I wasn't looking for an "edge," nor do I need one. I have enough experience to almost expect a sudden change in documentation. I had a feeling that you modified your profile to suit this thread, and sure enough you did. You were/are dishonest. It's as simple as that, and your stunt with the profile proves it in no uncertain terms. Tell me, who do you plan to pose as next? If we were talking about bread, I'm sure you'd make yourself a baker.

The most you have done is talk yourself in circles....

Really? Oddly enough, this thread doesn't substantiate yet another in a series of conveniently generated claims. If you don't mind my asking, are you planning to continue parroting my comments and tossing them back at me? May I suggest, "I know you are, but what am I." It may be just as childish and similarly lacking in intellectual thrust, but at least it's more honest.

...and claimed I am trying to insult you...

Yes, I do find obfuscatory text and strawman arguments insulting. Perhaps I shouldn't, as they speak solely of your credibility, or its lack thereof as the case may be.

....while trying to discount any quantitative properties I asked that made you come to your conclusion.

Is this some kind of a joke? "Quantitative properties" driven by an opinion based on personal observation is an oxymoron in its purest form. Are there any other straws you'd like to grasp?

It was a simple question and not a attack on your person.

It was an insult to my intelligence. Try acting honestly.

I found your opinion interesting because of all the cars we looked prior to purchasing the lancer I found it to have a better quality interior than many in its price range.

That's a fascinating comment, given your non-ending stipulations revolving around not being to tell any difference.

First, you spend numerous lines of text claiming that you cannot tell the difference in interior quality, but now all of a sudden you can. Which time did you lie?

Your original post claimed compared to the current model evo, the new lancer interior quality was sub par

Who said otherwise?

the quality of the interior plastics was rather disappointing. They felt thin, hollow, and cheap. Honestly, I did not feel like its quality was as good as that of the CT9A.

Ok so its worse than the evo even though

Even though, what?

How long do you plan to keep this going? I can go on forever, seeing how much there is to work with.

However,
I'm fully aware the interiors are almost the same, which makes the new Lance even more of a step in the wrong direction (in this respect). Again, that has zero relevance to the thrust of my comments.

?

Is there a point to this, or do you expect one to materialize out of thin air?

Wait, are you trying to point to the relevance issue, when by your own admission the interiors are almost the same? If so, please allow me to point out that parity made your comment completely irrelevant; hence my reply. You wanna try again with something less goofy? "I said, you said" games aren't much to be proud of, even as a last resort. If it'll make you happy, I can change the phrasing to something that requires no added thought.

I'm not a plastics expert, I work with forming textiles that don't have stopping power for fragmentation and ballistics into compounds that do, using a wide variety of materials, however I'm familiar with many things automotive.

Who cares?

You've taken my wording out of context to suit your argument.

If that were so, you could easily illustrate that and point to my supposed lack of credibility. Unfortunately, things evolved very differently. Nothing was taken out of context, as the intent of your comments was not changed. I replied to every point you made individually. You may want to try doing the same. Oh, wait, you can't, as every time you've made-up a story or attempted to pass some insipid assertion, you were confronted directly and on-point. The truth seems to be that you simply don't like being made aware of the untenable nature of your position, especially so graphically.

I guess I should have been more specific, but for automotive trim parts application, plastic is plastic in my opinion.

I think it's safe to say that everyone reading this got the point already. Next?

Perhaps the particular car you sat in was a poor example, I suggest you check out a few more before drawing a concrete conclusion, as I'm sure your aware that one is not always a representation of all.

Why, do other Lancers have different interior trim? Clearly, they do not.

Let me ask you again, why are you keeping this going? I'm willing to leave it as a difference of opinion, as I've said numerous times, but noooooooo. You come back and back again, claiming points more ludicrous than the next and then complaining about being caught in your own web of deceitful and dishonest behavior. Given all this, try to find a pair and not cry when you're involved in an incident of your own making. Accept some responsibility for your own fait as a welcome change.