Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right

Go Back   Mitsubish Lancer Evolution Forum - EvoTuners.net > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Newbie/General Forum
Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Classifieds Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Newbie/General Forum Beginner/basic questions and general EVO discussion. Specific questions should be asked in a focused forum below. This area is for the newbies.

   
Registered users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
» Sub-Navigation
· Home
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» EVOtuners Drivers
Sponsors

Sponsors

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2007, 05:51 PM   #16 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by SicLanEvo View Post
I agree I got rid of my Greddy type-s that I was recirculating for a Evo IX BOV. I couldn't be happier. It works perfect and never gives me any problems!
Can you really tell that big of a difference between the blow offs (SSQV and JDM MR DV) as far as performance or acceleration? I'm thinking of switching it out because everyone I've spoke with here seems to hate the HKS.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 06:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Under acceleration, there is no downside to the HKS. Its problems occur between shifts (rich condition), at idle, and when negatively accelerating to a stop with the clutch in (low vaccuum). Sometimes, the idle symptoms don't surface, but the rich condition between shifts is unavoidable. There is absolutely no reason to use that HKS on an Evo still using the MAF.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 06:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
I also have the HKS electronic idle stablizer installed. I know it effects my RPMs when I'm braking because it's keeping the car from dying out. With the EIS and recirculation kit, Is it still not a good choice?
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:16 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
It's even worse of a choice, because that's just more money spent to fool the ECU only for the purpose of helping the idle. It should raise a huge red flag when a company makes an extra part that you have to buy JUST TO MAKE THE FIRST PART WORK!! It's such a racket, but HKS doesn't care, because people STILL buy that stuff. I understand if your car already had it on there when you bought it, but I'd be looking to sell it all for a good chunk of change and get a used $50 JDM MR DV, then use the cash towards cams and a tune.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
Bummer... well I should probably get that switched out cause I don't want the EIS getting in the way of my flash/tune. I bought the car brand new and the only reason I chose that BOV is because I thought HKS was one of the best companies around so I figured thier blow offs were just as good. My buddy is looking for a blow off to buy and I was thinking of selling him mine to get the JDM MR DV. Only thing is he has a 97 Talon Tsi (4G63), is this not a good choice for him either? I don't want to sell him something thats bad for his car.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:42 PM   #21 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
It should only be used on a car that uses speed density (MAP) instead of a MAF.

Yes, HKS is one of the biggest NAMES, but that doesn't mean their Evo products are good. Luckily, their cams do work well, but they are $100 more per set than other cams that make the same power.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
I don't think he's running speed density because the car is bone stock. So probley not good for him either. Err, I really hate to undo so much thats been done. Is it that important? Where can I find a new JDM MR DV?
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:19 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
From several shops like NoLimitMotorsports, or you can just get a used one from someone for even less. The stock IX DV is the same as the JDM MR DV, so if you find any misguided IX owner who has "upgraded," then you can probably get theirs cheaply.

You're not undoing much. A BOV takes mere minutes to replace.

Yes, it IS important. People sure do seem to hang onto those things for dear life, man, I tell ya...


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 05:02 AM   #24 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 252
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: SicLanEvo is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to SicLanEvo
If you are desperate go to the dealer, otherwise search around a lot of venders carry them for a great price!
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 11:20 AM   #25 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Club Region: Outside North America
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 137
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: ghoonk may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via MSN to ghoonk Send a message via Yahoo to ghoonk Send a message via Skype™ to ghoonk
Let's put it this way. I have come across evos with the SSQV that stalled mid-corner when the driver shifted. Now, that was at 80 mph, total loss of power assisted steering, and if it wasn't for my friend's quick reflexes to restart the car, he would have been part of a concrete wall.

Now, for an SSQV, is that worth it? What if you were going quickly around a bend and you shifted, and the engine cut out, would you want to risk hitting a wall, or heaven forbid, pedestrians or other road users?

All it takes is one occurrence to really ruin your day.

Yes, some people run SSQVs without problems. In fact, it is said that the JDM Evo IX does not suffer this fate due to the operation of a MAP sensor in addition to the MAF sensor. The Evo VIII, on the other hands, runs off a MAF sensor exclusively, unless a 3 bar MAP sensor has been added with the benefit of a standalone ECU such as an APEX'i PowerFC D-Jetro or a motec ECU.


____________________________
: Mostly stock MY05 Evo VIII MR RS :
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 04:54 PM   #26 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghoonk View Post
Let's put it this way. I have come across evos with the SSQV that stalled mid-corner when the driver shifted. Now, that was at 80 mph, total loss of power assisted steering, and if it wasn't for my friend's quick reflexes to restart the car, he would have been part of a concrete wall.

Now, for an SSQV, is that worth it? What if you were going quickly around a bend and you shifted, and the engine cut out, would you want to risk hitting a wall, or heaven forbid, pedestrians or other road users?

All it takes is one occurrence to really ruin your day.

Yes, some people run SSQVs without problems. In fact, it is said that the JDM Evo IX does not suffer this fate due to the operation of a MAP sensor in addition to the MAF sensor. The Evo VIII, on the other hands, runs off a MAF sensor exclusively, unless a 3 bar MAP sensor has been added with the benefit of a standalone ECU such as an APEX'i PowerFC D-Jetro or a motec ECU.
I have never once had the car bog or try to die out between shifts. It runs like a champ which is why im so hesitant to gid rid of it. The ONLY reason I am considering getting rid of it is because I want what's best for the car. Not cause I'm not satisfied with its performance. It just kinda sucks that I paid so much for the HKS and now I have to pay more to go back to a stock BOV. That's what I get I guess for ot doing more research before hand.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 11:56 AM   #27 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Club Region: Outside North America
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 137
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: ghoonk may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via MSN to ghoonk Send a message via Yahoo to ghoonk Send a message via Skype™ to ghoonk
Yeah, I know the feeling. I felt it when I got rid of my GReddy Type-RS at a loss too. Anyway, just my 2 cents, why not get rid of it and switch to a Forge instead? The SSQV is tried and known to be bad, while the Forge is tried, tested and praised to death


____________________________
: Mostly stock MY05 Evo VIII MR RS :
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 01:35 PM   #28 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Darwin's 8's Avatar
 
Car: 05 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 110
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Darwin's 8 is an unknown
Is the Forge noisy or is it pretty quiet?

Last edited by Warrtalon : 03-10-2007 at 01:56 PM. Reason: Fixed misspellings
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 01:56 PM   #29 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
It's much quieter than any VTA BOV, but with an intake, any BOV is still kinda loud. Mine is louder than I want it to be, but it's unavoidable with a cone filter.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2007, 05:57 PM   #30 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
yangs4ever4g63's Avatar
 
Car: 03 EVO
Timeslip: 13.676 @ 99.82
Dynosheet: N/Awhp/N/A lb-ft
Club Region: Southeast
Registered: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: yangs4ever4g63 is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to yangs4ever4g63
jdm mr dv finally working!


Hey, I noticed this post was about blow off valves; I just wanted to mention that my car was stalling and was harder to run when I installed my JDM MR DV. It wasn't running as smooth as stock. Shifting was harder, missing gears here and there. Under heavy loads and pressure, it wouldn't run smooth. Finally, the day before, I thought about switching it back to the stock Blow off valve. But right before that, I decided if I should switch the Jdm Mr Dv backwards. Meaning, currently, the top metal part of da BOV is facing the left side. Before the top metal part of the BOV was on top. Right now, the car is running smoother and idling stock. But also, there is no more blow off noise. Its now completely quiet? Is this supposed to happen with the JDM MR DV? When I installed it wrong at first, It DID have a sound; but now since the cars running fine. It doesn't make any more sounds, its back to how it sounded when it was stock. Any body have any ideas if I did it right? Let me know.


____________________________
Dj PaRiS
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.1.0

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.