I just sent this to Turbo Magazine. What do you think? - Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum
Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right
 

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Newbie/General Forum
Register Forum Active Topics (T) Gallery Classifieds Garage Mark Forums Read

Newbie/General Forum Beginner/basic questions and general EVO discussion. Specific questions should be asked in a focused forum below. This area is for the newbies.

EvoTuners.net is the premier Mitsubishi Evolution Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2005, 08:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
turbolarry's Avatar
 
Club Region: SoCal
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,588
Images: 10
Reputation: turbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpful
I just sent this to Turbo Magazine. What do you think?


Am I out of line?

Last edited by turbolarry; 12-08-2005 at 10:44 AM.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-07-2005, 08:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
I personally have not used a flash in my EVO, but for simplicity of operation and convenience I have a flashing unit from Cobb Tuning for my wifes WRX. Granted a flash is not for a "hard core" tuning adventure, but it works great, and the off the shelf maps are safe from coast to coast in all weather conditions.... just like a mail in flash for the EVO. Will a mail in flash be optimized for your setup in your particular location? Nope. Will it add power over the stock tune from the factory? Yup. I actually do think you are out of line. I don't understand why you are so rabbidly anti flash (from any vendor), and not sure why you have such a hard on for Al in particular. I don't give a crap one way or the other about Al, but flash tech is pretty darn cool and it saddens me to see you bad mouthing it every chance you get.

Keith <------ Uses an AEM EMS just like Al.... and likes flash tech as well just like Al I wonder if it is because we are both fat?


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 09:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
turbolarry's Avatar
 
Club Region: SoCal
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,588
Images: 10
Reputation: turbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpful
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
I actually do think you are out of line. I don't understand why you are so rabbidly anti flash (from any vendor), and not sure why you have such a hard on for Al in particular. I don't give a crap one way or the other about Al, but flash tech is pretty darn cool and it saddens me to see you bad mouthing it every chance you get.
Thanks. I guess I should lighten up and I know flashes play their role. I like ECUTEK. I guess it's because of what's happened here and Las Vegas... and then to see five pages of his product in Turbo Magazine. Your right. Thanks. From here on out I let it go.


P.S.
I don't think your fat.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 05:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Reputation: nothere is an unknown
I wasn't aware big Al had a failure with one of his tunes. Could you give some of the particulars?

I wouldn't say you were out of line, just expressing a different opinion. Heaven knows we all have our weak points, if the mag made a saint out of Al maybe they were a little unrealistic.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 10:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,539
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Turbolarry, you've watched me progress from the first day I showed up here asking about using my old S-AFC on my new Evo. I was very successful with tuning it myself and accomplished great things at the track:

12.83 - S-AFC only with 93oct
12.64 - S-AFC/catback/mbc with 93oct
12.22 - s-afc/catback/mbc with 104oct
12.01 - S-AFC/tbe/mbc with 110oct

I have since added a BASE flash from Dynoflash, and I have to admit that it is far better overall than just having the S-AFC. I of course kept the safc installed for fine tuning on pump gas and also for race gas tuning at the track, but the SAFC was not capable of providing what the flash gave me. The most important features to me were the raised rev limit (critical for an MR on the drag strip due to 4th gear ending at 111mph), and fixed the mid-range (richened the factory lean condition while keeping timing at no less than 8*). The SAFC really IS a crude tuning device, despite how much we love it, because it can't control timing. It's just a manipulator that can be successful in the hands of a smart individual, but it still has its limitations . You cant ever change the rev limit, and the only way to get that low-end/mid-range/peak torque like a flash is by using larger injectors. That's not worth the cost, time, or tuning effort imo.

Now, to make it even better, Al is providing launch control, which is HUGE for me, because it will make me even more consistent at the drag strip. Instead of the factory 5k limiter being too low, I can now have it set to 6k, which is great. Al may have his shortcomings, and flashes may not appeal as much to the true tuning enthusiast, but they do serve purposes that can't be addressed by the SAFC.


__________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 11:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
turbolarry's Avatar
 
Club Region: SoCal
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,588
Images: 10
Reputation: turbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpful
Upon further reflection; I'm way out of line and it should not have been posted.
I apolgize to all for violating the sites rules and I know I'm not above them. The rules are there for a reason and what makes this site so good. I have to go by them too.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2005, 07:11 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,319
Images: 7
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Send a message via AIM to SicLanEvo
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbolarry
Upon further reflection; I'm way out of line and it should not have been posted.
I apolgize to all for violating the sites rules and I know I'm not above them. The rules are there for a reason and what makes this site so good. I have to go by them too.

I thought it was very well put. It gave a different point of view on the subject, yes you broke some rules, but it was very well put. and by the way this is a Great site!
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM.


© 2007 AutoForums.com - EVOtuners.net - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.