Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right

Go Back   Mitsubish Lancer Evolution Forum - EvoTuners.net > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Bolt-On Power Mods
Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Classifieds Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Bolt-On Power Mods Intake, exhaust, intake manifold, ignition, fuel system, cooling, etc.

   
Registered users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
» Sub-Navigation
· Home
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Network Links
»Misubishi Lancer Evolution Car Reviews
»Motorcycle Reviews
»Motorcycle Classifieds
»ATV Reviews
»Jetski Reviews
» EVOtuners Drivers
Sponsors

Sponsors

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2007, 02:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
JohnEB's Avatar
 
Car: 06 EVO
Dynosheet: 645whp/555 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 364
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: JohnEB may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via AIM to JohnEB
Making my game plan for new turbo setup. Input welcome!

Well after talking about getting a new turbo and all the support mods the time has finally came and I figured I would post my plan here so I could get suggestions from fellow members so I can be sure I am making the right choice.

Here is a list of parts I am going with,

AMS 50 Trim Turbo
AMS FMIC (Street Core)
AMS UICP
AMS Fuel Rail
780cc Injectors ----- Suggestions on which company...???
Perrin water injection system
Head Studs ----- Suggestions on which company...???
GSC Stage 2 Cams
Exedy Twin HD Cerametallic clutch.

This should be interesting since no one in the Rocky Mountain region is running this turbo yet that I am aware of. I am looking to run around 25-26 pounds of boost with Meth/Alky injection.

Like I said if anyone has any input in this please do as I want to make this project as successful and as "complete" as possible to insure I am not taking the wrong path.

Also Justin I need to get with you on making a plan for installs and tuning! I had met you at the meeting sunday through Clayton.
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 02:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
turbolarry's Avatar
 
Club Region: SoCal
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,588
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Run it.
As far as injectors, I've had two sets from FIC and never had a problem 5 years running.
$269 for 750cc's and $280 for 850cc's
http://www.fuelinjectorclinic.com/ca...i.htm#LucasInj
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 03:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,540
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
It all looks good to me. Only input I have is:

- Consider a larger FMIC than the street core
- Head studs = ARP
- Be sure that's a Perrin ALKY or METH injection system - you won't be doing water injection
- Use whatever injectors AMS sells and/or recommends. Also, consider 880s
- Don't need the fuel rail - another local Evo runs 1000cc injectors on his Apexi RX6 turbo on the stock fuel rail. I know, because I helped him install the injectors in the parking lot, hah.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 03:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
JohnEB's Avatar
 
Car: 06 EVO
Dynosheet: 645whp/555 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 364
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: JohnEB may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via AIM to JohnEB
No fuel rail? Sounds great to me just another $200 to save and put else where so thank you! And 880's just in case I decide to run race gas correct? Yes I am going with meth/ alky injection that was just a poor choice of description. Suggestions on a good bov? I know the stocker is out due to the new intake tube and uicp.
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 06:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,540
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Forge RS, but not because the stocker is out. Even a new intake/uicp should accommodate the normal routing of our BOV, otherwise you'd have to run VTA, and that's not right.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
WANTED's Avatar
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: WANTED is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon View Post
It all looks good to me. Only input I have is:


- Don't need the fuel rail - another local Evo runs 1000cc injectors on his Apexi RX6 turbo on the stock fuel rail. I know, because I helped him install the injectors in the parking lot, hah.

I'm gonna interject on this suggestion. This is a crap shoot when running injectors 880cc and above only because you could run into "injector pulse." With the 780cc and below, you shouldn't need the rail.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,540
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
I don't consider it a crap shoot. Many, many Evos run 880s and 1000s with the stock rail, but you do have to tune it properly and be aware of any potential issues.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
WANTED's Avatar
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: WANTED is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon View Post
I don't consider it a crap shoot. Many, many Evos run 880s and 1000s with the stock rail, but you do have to tune it properly and be aware of any potential issues.

For the guys that do run the stock rail, they are also probably using injectors far bigger than they need to be and scaling them down low as well. Essentially, the only reasons they have the size injectors they do is in case they want to go with a more horsepower producing motor setup than they currently have or because they want to have that extra insurance of having enough fuel on demand, which is where you were going with your initial suggestion (I think.). A friend of mine is using 1600cc injectors (which absolutely requires a fuel rail) for this very reason.
Injector pulse really becomes an issue on the stock rail when hitting the higher duty cycles on large injectors. Essentially, when your trying to use lager injectors to their full potential depending on what you're trying to accomplish, the stock rail creates a "bottleneck" which slows down the amount of fuel being delivered to all the injectors and thus causing the "pulse."
Make no mistake, the stock fuel lines can support ample fuel demands. So too can the rail and fpr. What I'm trying to say is that by my preference, If I were considering using injectors in the 800cc+ territory, this is why I'd swap the fuel rail.

Other than that, I see no problem with the setup suggestions so far. Should be a fun setup.

Last edited by WANTED : 03-07-2007 at 06:07 PM.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 01:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,540
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
You are probably right in most cases, but the one example I gave was a pretty large Apexi turbo, and he's making 450whp up here on the Dyno Dynamics at RP in the Springs. I made 300whp on that same dyno, and he has trapped 120+ at PMI. That's GT35R range almost when you consider the altitude...


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 06:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
WANTED's Avatar
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: WANTED is an unknown
Yes sir, it's pretty darn close to gt35r territory.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
JohnEB's Avatar
 
Car: 06 EVO
Dynosheet: 645whp/555 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 364
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: JohnEB may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via AIM to JohnEB
Well it is something to consider but honestly if it is a safer way to go then its worth the extra $200 but if not I won't bother.
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
WANTED's Avatar
 
Car: 03 EVO
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: WANTED is an unknown
You're buying from AMS, who has LOADS of evo building experience. Ask them what they recommend and why. You also already have mine and Warrtalon's info to suport your decision as well.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,540
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Well, it's their own product, so that's not always the best advice...


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 12:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
JohnEB's Avatar
 
Car: 06 EVO
Dynosheet: 645whp/555 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 364
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: JohnEB may or may not be a helpful member
Send a message via AIM to JohnEB
Right and thats why instead of asking "AMS" what they think I should run as far as products I ask you guys because of course someone is going to support their own products.
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 11:04 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Trader Rating: (1)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Quote:
Originally Posted by WANTED View Post
I'm gonna interject on this suggestion. This is a crap shoot when running injectors 880cc and above only because you could run into "injector pulse." With the 780cc and below, you shouldn't need the rail.
I have been running 1000's for a couple years now on the stock fuel rail with no problems.

Keith


____________________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.1.0

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0