|
IF that particular mustang dyno is set up exactly like Dave Buschurs Mustang dyno (unlikely since he has one of the lowest reading Mustang dyno's in the country) that would be aprox. equivelent to 425 on an average dynojet.
The reason Warrtalon says you can't do conversions like this is because of all of the guesses and estimates in the above paragraph. A mustang dyno can be manipulated to read anywhere from way low like it comes from the factory up to reading identical or higher than a dynojet all based on how it is calibrated. Also, not all Dynojet dyno's read the same either. The comparison is futile.
The only way to really know anything is to use the same dyno for back to back comparisons. My car on Dave Buschurs Mustang dyno made 210 wheel HP when bone stock, it is now making 452 HP on that very same dyno.
Now since I know what my car is rated for stock, and what it made on Dave's dyno I can produce a correction factor to calculate flywheel HP. {skip calcs to avoid more typing) Those calculations put me at ABOUT615 crank HP and I should make around 520 on an average dynojet.
Since we don't know what an EVO baselines at on the dyno you used, we can't really estimate your crank HP or what it would be equivelent to on a dynojet.
Sorry,
Keith
PS: Your best bet is to find identical setups with the only variation being the turbocharger used and tested on the same exact dyno. Even then tuning variations will make a big difference.
__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
|