Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right

Go Back   Mitsubish Lancer Evolution Forum - EvoTuners.net > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Cylinder Head & Short Block
Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Classifieds Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Cylinder Head & Short Block Cams, valvetrain, pistons, rods, stroker kits, swaps, etc. Advanced modification discussions only.

   
Registered users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
» Sub-Navigation
· Home
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» EVOtuners Drivers
Sponsors

Sponsors

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-01-2007, 06:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
Anybody have experience with Brian Crower Cams?

I am seriously thinking about going with a set of these cams. I could get a set of 272/272's with springs and retainers for less than $500.

Anyone have any experience with them? I have seen vendors say good things about them..but they also sell them.

For the money...I am on the verge of giving them a shot.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 06:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Great price from a great name, but I still have yet to see any results on customer cars, much less SUSTAINED and REPEATABLE results. I'd wait until there is more proof. Plus, $450 for GSC and Comp is still a steal for what ends up being 30whp/30wtq, and those cams are proven. HKS cams are proven, too, but they are more like $550.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 10:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
I see your logic...but, somebody has to be first. I am going to go with these cams...for the price, I think it is worth the risk. I was wondering if anyone had these cams and what their experiences have been.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 11:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
I haven't seen any on any forum yet, and even one of my sponsors is pushing them, but they have no results yet either. I will let you know any and all info I hear, because it would be great for the community if these cams were reliable and powerful.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
Well, I bought a set of the Brian Crower Stage II cams, the 272/272 style combo. I got a smoking deal ( $289 shipped) from Maperformance out of Minnesota. I saw their ad on DSMtuners looking to see if DSM'er's have been using these cams. There are a bunch of people using them and they are showing promising results. I felt the price was low enough that I was willing to give them a shot.

Anyway, I won't be getting them installed for a while because I refuse to drive my car in the winter because I enjoy not having to use the handy dandy blue tipped wrench on my car .

I plan on dynoing the car and running it at the track before I install them to show a before and after......I hope I can have that much self control. Plus, with not driving my car in the winter, I still have serious break in miles to do on my new clutch, so that will help.

I'll keep everyone posted.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:18 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Ah, you refuse not to drive it in the winter?!! Man, the whole point of the Evo is that you can drive it anytime and anywhere. We've had 3 blizzards here in Colorado Springs, but I still drive mine daily. I wouldn't be able to stand not driving this thing all winter. I race the hell out of it, but it's still my daily driver, and I mean DAILY driver.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 86
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: mdog is an unknown
I wish I could be more like Warrtalon in this respect. I always get a car with intentions of driving it all the time and then it usually sits more often then not because I drive my beater all over the place. Now, my mustang should sell this weekend and come late spring/summer I'll be hunting down a DAILY(well, at least nice days ) driver(EVO) that will make my daily commute a bit more fun.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 12:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
F the beater unless the Evo is broken. Drive it daily, ohyes!!


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 12:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
You must have had good experiences with salt and cars.....the salt totally DESTROYS the metal on the car. I had a 1997 GSX that drove in the winter for one year....I could not break any of the bolts under the car loose after that!! I had to use a torch for everything!!! I want the MR to last more than three years, so yes, it won't be driven here in the winter.

As far as daily driven....I just moved from California. I drove the EVO every day 70 miles to work round trip. I had 24,000 miles in one year. I drove to Arizona and Montana with the car ( Good part: Hours of triple digit speeds in the desert Bad part: no cruise control to keep me in check ) I love to drive the car. Not driving it everyday makes the times I do drive it more sweet.

I love the car and it is my "fun" car. Driving cars in the winter will definitely shorten it's life span. I want to be able to work on the car without having to replace all of the bolts every damn time.

Working on your car with hand tools including turbo removal is sweet. Having snapped bolts, bolts seized with rust, having to use a torch to remove exhaust bolts that snap sucks balls.

Plus, I have a nice winter car ( 1999 Toyota 4Runner) So why mess my car up?
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 01:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Ah, well, that doesn't stop me. I haven't had any problems with bolts rusting like that. Maybe because they use sand here instead of salt?


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 03:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
Well I got a before dyno....but I don't know what to think of it...the torque seems way to high. The AFR looks ok...but I am baffled by the high torque number. It is on a dynojet.

Mods are: TTP email flash, Works drop in filter, 255 fuel pump, ported/coated stock manifold, coated E bay o2 housing, lower intercooler pipe, coated 2.75" down pipe, test pipe, 3" catback.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scan.jpg (75.8 KB, 89 views)
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 03:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
That would indicate that you're running REALLY high boost. Where is your boost set?

Notice that you hit peak whp at around 4750rpm when you should peak at 6500rpm. This is another indication of running really high boost.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 03:27 PM   #13 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.5 @ 111.28
Dynosheet: 334whp/312 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: gbpkr is an unknown
I thought I had it set for 22 at the peak....but after I the test pipe on.....the boost pegged the gauge. I am still using the stock gauge ( Stupid) But I never had a problem with the high boost before. I figured something was not right. I don't want to get a boost controller...but it looks like I'll have to.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 06:01 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,497
Trader Rating: (0)
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
No reason not to get an MBC. It's an $85 mod that works wonderfully and will keep you from running dangerous boost levels like you are currently doing.


____________________________
11.51@117.72 - PMI
11.62@116.60 - Bandi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 06:30 PM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
Trader Rating: (1)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
I agree 100% on this. Boost was way higher than you thought it was. The top of the gauge is 22 psi, but if you were already running that before the test pipe on a stock cat, you are probably peaking closer to 27 psi. If you were running a good high flow replacement cat before the swap to a test pipe, you are probably peaking around 25 psi now.... in either case you need to lower it a bit!

Keith


____________________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v2.1.0

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.