Any dyno sheets? - Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum
Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right
 

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Tuning & Engine Management
Register Forum Active Topics (T) Gallery Classifieds Garage Mark Forums Read

Tuning & Engine Management Engine Management, EGT temps, timing, wideband, datalogging, fuel trims, etc.

EvoTuners.net is the premier Mitsubishi Evolution Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2004, 06:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Ludachris's Avatar
 
Dynosheet: 424whp/401 lb-ft
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 401
Reputation: Ludachris is an unknown
Any dyno sheets?

Anyone been to the dyno yet? Any slips?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-23-2004, 07:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Lets see if I can get these to come up.....

First is Stock VS tuned on 93 octane with Turbo XS HPBC that was peaking at 20 psi and dropping off to 18 psi at redline, Blitz SUS cone filter, and Apexi Super AFC II.

Keith

OK, even though my dyno sheet is well under 500K (it is only 272K) the web page says it is too big because it is more than 700 by 700.... can we get this fixed guys?


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2004, 10:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Ludachris's Avatar
 
Dynosheet: 424whp/401 lb-ft
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 401
Reputation: Ludachris is an unknown
Quote:
Originally posted by Fourdoor
Lets see if I can get these to come up.....

First is Stock VS tuned on 93 octane with Turbo XS HPBC that was peaking at 20 psi and dropping off to 18 psi at redline, Blitz SUS cone filter, and Apexi Super AFC II.

Keith

OK, even though my dyno sheet is well under 500K (it is only 272K) the web page says it is too big because it is more than 700 by 700.... can we get this fixed guys?
What are the dimensions of your file? can you scale it down to less than 700 pixels?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Quote:
Originally posted by Ludachris
What are the dimensions of your file? can you scale it down to less than 700 pixels?
Tried that and it came out way distorted. Can the board be set up with just a size limit of half a meg without the dimension limit? Since we are starting fresh, this is the time to get things set up right. If it dosn't take up to much server space, the actuall dimensions shouldn't matter. Most people (like me) will just not post pictures if it is too much of a pain in the ass to do it.

Keith


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 10:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Ludachris's Avatar
 
Dynosheet: 424whp/401 lb-ft
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 401
Reputation: Ludachris is an unknown
Quote:
Originally posted by Fourdoor
Tried that and it came out way distorted. Can the board be set up with just a size limit of half a meg without the dimension limit? Since we are starting fresh, this is the time to get things set up right. If it dosn't take up to much server space, the actuall dimensions shouldn't matter. Most people (like me) will just not post pictures if it is too much of a pain in the ass to do it.

Keith
What are the dimensions? We don't really want files that are massive, which is why we have it set to 700 pixels - mainly for scrolling reasons. I'd be willing to up it to 800 pixels, but not too much more than that.

If the file is distorting when you resize it, it's probably because it's a GIF file. Do you have photoshop? I can show you a trick that will fix it. You can also email it to me if you like. PM me and I'll give you my email address.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2004, 10:53 AM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Quote:
Originally posted by Ludachris
What are the dimensions? We don't really want files that are massive, which is why we have it set to 700 pixels - mainly for scrolling reasons. I'd be willing to up it to 800 pixels, but not too much more than that.

If the file is distorting when you resize it, it's probably because it's a GIF file. Do you have photoshop? I can show you a trick that will fix it. You can also email it to me if you like. PM me and I'll give you my email address.
800 would be great! This file is only about 730 wide... I think the distortion was because I was only resizing it a tinny little bit...or something like that

Keith


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2004, 11:46 AM   #7 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Ludachris's Avatar
 
Dynosheet: 424whp/401 lb-ft
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 401
Reputation: Ludachris is an unknown
Quote:
Originally posted by Fourdoor
800 would be great! This file is only about 730 wide... I think the distortion was because I was only resizing it a tinny little bit...or something like that

Keith
Done - 800 pixels is now the max width for attachments. I've resized the max height to 1000 pixels. Hope that will be sufficient.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Hey everyone!

Well, just finished dynoing at Godspeed in Novi Michigan on their Dynapack AWD dyno.

On pump gas with a very conservative pump gas tune on the AEM EMS running the stock turbo I made 332 HP at 6,500 RPM running 20 psi of boost at readline! That is SAE corrected. The torque is read uncorrected on a Dynapack, and it was 316 @ 3700 RPM. Taking the HP at that RPM (240 HP @ 3700 RPM) and running it through the calculator over at http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...ls/torque.html
you come up with 340 lb-ft of torque at 3700 RPM SAE corrected.

If I was able to run 22 psi at redline that would have helped a lot, but in order to do that with my manual boost controler I would need to be running 25 psi at low RPM....and I am not willing to do that on pump gas. My next step is to get a GM solenoid valve and set up the AEM EMS to do my boost control.... Bet I could have broken 360 on pump with a couple more ponds of boost.

BTW, all of this was at an A/F ratio of 11.5:1 with conservative timing settings tuned in by Tym over at Buschur Racing.

Way to go Tym!

Keith


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 02:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
Images: 40
Reputation: bpclements is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to bpclements Send a message via Yahoo to bpclements
I've some. I will try to take a pic of them and post it up. I made 268whp. I am making much more now though after tunning my S-AFC 2.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 05:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Here is the new sheet!

This is my old pump gas dyno sheet (boost control, Super AFC II and air filter) compared to my new pump gas dyno sheet with the BR 4.5 setup I was talking about earlier.

Keith
Attached Images
 


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 06:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
Images: 40
Reputation: bpclements is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to bpclements Send a message via Yahoo to bpclements
Nice!!!!!!!!!!!!
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 09:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 239
Reputation: 12secEVO is an unknown
thats pretty damn good for whp...I wasn't past 350hp (not wheel) with my GST...and that had a ton of mods...and on a big16g on 21psi

I'm so excited to get an evo


__________________
Should have a White 03 soon....
Or I might be waiting for the MR

Or I just bought my 00' S2k ;)
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 10:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Quote:
Originally posted by 12secEVO
thats pretty damn good for whp...I wasn't past 350hp (not wheel) with my GST...and that had a ton of mods...and on a big16g on 21psi

I'm so excited to get an evo
Yup, the EVO seems to pull harder than my Galant VR-4 did. The Galant made 367 HP at the front wheels (2WD dynojet) on C-16, but it was a much heavier car. I think the EVO will be faster on pump gas than the Galant was on C-16

Keith


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 07:02 AM   #14 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
Images: 40
Reputation: bpclements is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to bpclements Send a message via Yahoo to bpclements
Here is my dyno sheet. I was running way to lean for 91 octane and 20 psi at redline. I richened it up to drop my afr to 11.0:1 and made two pulls at 285 and the last pull of 311whp on a buddies datalogger dyno tool. It is really accurate. Did a baseline to start off and it showed me at 265whp compared to the dyno that showed me at 268whp. My power is so jumppy because my afr was up and down throuhout the pull. I fixed that with my buddies wideband and she pulls alot smoother. That first pull is only 247 because I turned my boost down at first so it wouldn't spike on the dyno which was only at 17 psi.
Attached Images
 


__________________
[img]http://www.evotuners.net/forums/avatar.php?userid=70&dateline=1078285807[/img]
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 07:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Car: 03 EVO
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
Images: 40
Reputation: bpclements is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to bpclements Send a message via Yahoo to bpclements
Here is a closeup of my afr. I was way to lean for the 91.
Attached Images
 


__________________
[img]http://www.evotuners.net/forums/avatar.php?userid=70&dateline=1078285807[/img]
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 AM.


© 2007 AutoForums.com - EVOtuners.net - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.