I'm debating myself about this. - Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum
Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right
 

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Tuning & Engine Management
Register Forum Active Topics (T) Gallery Classifieds Garage Mark Forums Read

Tuning & Engine Management Engine Management, EGT temps, timing, wideband, datalogging, fuel trims, etc.

EvoTuners.net is the premier Mitsubishi Evolution Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2005, 06:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
V8eaterEVO's Avatar
 
Car: 04 EVO
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Images: 10
Reputation: V8eaterEVO is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to V8eaterEVO Send a message via MSN to V8eaterEVO Send a message via Yahoo to V8eaterEVO
I'm debating myself about this.

Ok, here goes. I'm debating whether or not to get a SAFC-II. I am getting a custom road tune by Al in December and I'm debating if I should also get the SAFC-II on top of the tune. Any feed back would be great. Also, I've done my searching but nothing on this subject. Please no BS post. Only post if you have an opinion on the matter. If not, DON'T post.

My goal is to get over 500 whp. After that, I'm done. I'm building this thing slowly. I'm installing my Cams and Cam gears this weekend.

Thanks in advance for the input.



__________________
Rob
2004 Apex Silver Evolution VIII
Mesa, AZ

"I hate a dirty engine bay, so clean your engine. It looks better."

Mods: Ram-Air Intake, Down-Pipe, Test Pipe, Cat-Back Exhaust, Turbo-Timer, Apexi AVC-R, LW Crank Pulley, 255lph Fuel Pump, BOV, Short Shifter, Tein S. Tech Lowering Springs, RS Trunk Bar.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-16-2005, 09:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.530 @ 123.37
Dynosheet: 452whp/362 lb-ft
Club Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 721
Images: 10
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
If you plan to run race gas sometimes, useing the SAFC to tune for leaner A/F ratio when running the race gas will give you a substantial gain in power.

Keith


__________________
EVO 11.53 @ 123.37, Black WRX Wagon 13.62 @ 99.24
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2005, 10:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
turbolarry's Avatar
 
Club Region: SoCal
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,588
Images: 10
Reputation: turbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpfulturbolarry is known to be trustworthy and helpful
If your serious about the 500whp, no I mean serious... don't waste your time or money on either one. Go stright to a stand alone. Here's why;
I've only done one S-AFC tune on top of a flash and it was the "custom road tune" too. It was conservative and the owner/buddy of mine asked me to see what I could do. I said OK and I learned one thing... IT'S A PAIN IN THE A$$. After numerous runs and drastic changes in the S-AFC settings, in both directions, I could not get the timing to budge. After some more seaching a questioning the owner and I settled on the idea that the programmed timing is locked. This makes road tuning with a logger very dangerous because the logger detects knock through timing. It might be OK to take the flash a little farther on a dyno, with a wideband and a seperate knock device.
So if you go this route, add the costs; The flash its self, his road tune, the cost of an S-AFC, dyno time (+wideband), seperate knock device (to really do it right)... That's the cost of AEM's EMS, which you know will give you all the control and support for more than 500whp.
On top of that, what size injectors are going to be needed to support 500whp? Are you sure a flash+S-AFC can control it?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2005, 12:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 10.9 @ 129.94
Club Region: Southeast
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 37
Reputation: DSM95Hybrid is an unknown
It is frustrating to read through these sometimes. You could run 10's on an upgrade turbo and SAFCII. I could program whatever timing you wanted in the flash. Hell, I was running 25* timing with the SAFC no problem. I would consider myself "serious" about staying ahead.


__________________
10.9 @ 129.94mph
Stock turbo/ Factory issued ECU
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2005, 02:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
V8eaterEVO's Avatar
 
Car: 04 EVO
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Images: 10
Reputation: V8eaterEVO is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to V8eaterEVO Send a message via MSN to V8eaterEVO Send a message via Yahoo to V8eaterEVO
Thanks everyone for the input. I have a plan now.


__________________
Rob
2004 Apex Silver Evolution VIII
Mesa, AZ

"I hate a dirty engine bay, so clean your engine. It looks better."

Mods: Ram-Air Intake, Down-Pipe, Test Pipe, Cat-Back Exhaust, Turbo-Timer, Apexi AVC-R, LW Crank Pulley, 255lph Fuel Pump, BOV, Short Shifter, Tein S. Tech Lowering Springs, RS Trunk Bar.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 10:17 AM   #6 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Club Region: Outside North America
Registered: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
Reputation: turboj_551 is an unknown
so what happened? was the safc useful? any gains?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM.


© 2007 AutoForums.com - EVOtuners.net - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.