i got my car tuned and dynoed - Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum
Mitsubishi Evo Forum Mitsubishi Evo Forum Header Right
 

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Mitsubishi Evolution Forums: Mitsubishi Lancer Forum > Lancer Evolution Tech Forums > Tuning & Engine Management
Register Forum Active Topics (T) Gallery Auto Loans Classifieds Garage Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance Advertise

Tuning & Engine Management Engine Management, EGT temps, timing, wideband, datalogging, fuel trims, etc.

EvoTuners.net is the premier Mitsubishi Evolution Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2007, 10:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.6 @ 113
Dynosheet: 490whp/468 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 229
Reputation: Qatar_Evo is an unknown
i got my car tuned and dynoed

thanx for justDSM Tuning my car and my mods was GSC S1 cams and turbo back and sweet tune by justDSM so i went to to see my numbers on the dyno and its was (dynomite)

and the car was tuned on street only so we still have littel bit to get more and the result was 312HP and 368TQ

so what do u think guys??
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-18-2007, 11:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 171
Reputation: Kdash106 is an unknown
what is your mod?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 04:22 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 442
Images: 2
Reputation: JustDSM is an unknown
I'll answer up for him

HKS RS Intake
HKS SSQ BOV
Hallman Pro MBC (Set too high... Turn that thing down so your boost gauge reads 1.5cm/kg^2 peak!)
Unknown Downpipe/Testpipe, HKS Carbon Exaust
GSC S1 Cams
Flash by me
Offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 09-19-2007, 05:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,506
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Are you sure it was 368wtq or 318wtq? I would be very concerned if you put down 312/368. That would indicate a big problem somewhere, imo.





__________________
[email protected] - PMI
[email protected] - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 08:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 442
Images: 2
Reputation: JustDSM is an unknown
It's because he was overboosting by a large margin, creating a huge torque spike. I've contacted him and instructed him to lower his boost level. There was some miscommunication, and he was under the impression he was supposed to be trying to hold 22psi to redline, instead of peaking at 22. So we had a overly high boost level creating that huge midrange torque in compairison to the top end power.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 02:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,506
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Ouch, very bad, but I'm pretty sure I've already explained that to him. Hard-headed Qatar!

That's especially bad at this altitude when we taper to 16-17psi by 7k normally on the stock turbo even with the boost maxed out. He's lucky the engine isn't already damaged...





__________________
[email protected] - PMI
[email protected] - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 08:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.6 @ 113
Dynosheet: 490whp/468 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 229
Reputation: Qatar_Evo is an unknown
ya just say everything for me already thanx man

i run it in drag today my ft was really bad coz of my clutch it was 2.1ft and [email protected]
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:58 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,506
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Your 60', you mean. Yeah, that's rough. Was your clutch slipping?





__________________
[email protected] - PMI
[email protected] - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 02:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.6 @ 113
Dynosheet: 490whp/468 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 229
Reputation: Qatar_Evo is an unknown
ya it was and i think its bcoz of the bigger wheels and semi slick i got on coz they really stick and the give the clutch hard time
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 03:16 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,506
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
You're running semi-slicks???





__________________
[email protected] - PMI
[email protected] - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 03:24 AM   #11 (permalink)
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 137
Reputation: ghoonk may or may not be a helpful member
Sounds like 'goodbye, drivetrain!'
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 02:48 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 804
Reputation: Evolvd is an unknown
He has RT-615's...not exactly semi-slick but pretty grippy.
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 05:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.6 @ 113
Dynosheet: 490whp/468 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 229
Reputation: Qatar_Evo is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolvd View Post
He has RT-615's...not exactly semi-slick but pretty grippy.
thanx for expressing me lol
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 05:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Timeslip: 11.510 @ 115.12
Dynosheet: 367whp/386 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,506
Images: 12
Reputation: Warrtalon is an unknown
Send a message via AIM to Warrtalon
Ah, RT-615s are not even close to r-compounds. Good, cheap replacement for the stock tires, but not close to a semi-slick.





__________________
[email protected] - PMI
[email protected] - Bandi
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 03:34 AM   #15 (permalink)
EVOtuners Member
 
Timeslip: 12.6 @ 113
Dynosheet: 490whp/468 lb-ft
Club Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 229
Reputation: Qatar_Evo is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon View Post
Ah, RT-615s are not even close to r-compounds. Good, cheap replacement for the stock tires, but not close to a semi-slick.
i didnt know coz i was comparing it to bikes tires its a long story no big deal any way warr
Offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 AM.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
© 2007 AutoForums.com - EVOtuners.net - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.