Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Forums banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,710 Posts
I don't know about the sound, but a 3.5 exhaust will out flow 99% of all other exhausts available for the Evo today. If you can get away with it, you can't go too big with a turbo system's exhaust.
What is your horsepower goal that makes you consider this exhaust?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
One of my friends told me that the APS would be a bad choice b/c you would lose torque. I dont see how this is possible since it has a turbo and that would be good for the car. I can see how that could happen on a nat aspirated car, like it did on my ss camaro when I went straight pipes, but on a turboed car? Someone let me know what they think about his comment. Thanks.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,710 Posts
dr0wningless0n5 said:
depends what he has done to the car the exhaust is too big for a stock evo i wouldnt think the car would have enough back pressure to run properly
You really can't go "too big" on a turbo car. The turbocharger it's self provides more than enough back pressure.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
turbolarry said:
You really can't go "too big" on a turbo car. The turbocharger it's self provides more than enough back pressure.

That's what I was thinking. I'm still debating if it's worth the extra 400 dollars for the 3.5" APS tbe. Mine's gonna be somewhat stock for a while. I think it's gonna be that or the AMS 3".
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top